Showing posts with label The Sunday Times. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Sunday Times. Show all posts

Thursday, 3 December 2015

Boks Coach Meyer Steps Down


Heyneke Meyer will not seek a renewal of his contract to coach South Africa when his current deal expires on 31 December, the South African Rugby Union has confirmed.

Meyer had said he would like to stay after leading the team to third place at the Rugby World Cup, but has made an about-turn after receiving stinging criticism of the team’s style of play and his record on transformation of the side.

South Africa were beaten 34-32 by Japan in their tournament opener before succumbing to eventual champions New Zealand in the semi-finals.

“I have always put the Springboks first in my time as coach and since returning from England I have realised that as much as I believe I still have a lot to offer, the time has come for change,” Meyer said in a press statement.

“My integrity has always been very important and I feel I can leave with my head held high. I’ve always maintained that my only motivation was to serve my country and to do what was best for the Springboks.

“I have put my heart and soul into the job and did my very best. I believe that, overall, I leave the team with much to look forward to in 2016, with new structures in place to ensure the Springboks will remain competitive on the world stage.

“The Springboks are a special team and carrying the hopes of a nation is a huge responsibility and great privilege. I realised that yet again with all the support I received from ordinary South Africans, both at the World Cup and upon our return to the country. Thank you to the countless faithful, positive and passionate supporters that have made my job as coach a joy.”

Oregan Hoskins, president of the South African Rugby Union, called the moment “a natural watershed”, adding: “Heyneke gave his all for the Springboks and it was a great pleasure to work with such a passionate South African. There were many highlights during his time as coach and those are the moments we will remember.”


Monday, 30 November 2015

Russian Agency Not Being Disbanded


The Russian Anti-Doping Agency will not be disbanded despite the scandal surrounding the systematic doping of Russian athletes, the country’s sports minister, Vitaly Mutko, said on Monday.

Rusada was heavily criticised in the independent commission report put together by Dick Pound on behalf of World Anti-Doping Agency earlier this month and was suspended after being declared “non-compliant with immediate effect” at a Wada meeting in Colorado.

The scandal has led to all Russian athletes being banned indefinitely by IAAF, a decision Russia decided last week to accept alongside the promise to cooperate with inspectors who will oversee changes to its drug-testing system. However, Mutko has insisted that it’s own testing authority will not be shut down.

“No doubt, Rusada will remain as an organisation,” he is quoted as saying by the Russian news agency, Tass. “We have started working [jointly with Wada].”





Thursday, 26 November 2015

Nike Swoosh Over for Coe


Sebastian Coe has stepped down from his ambassadorial role with Nike with immediate effect.

The IAAF president had been under pressure to relinquish the post he has held for nearly 40 years after being accused of a conflict of interest. In a press conference following a meeting of the IAAF’s council, Coe admitted his role had become a distraction but denied that it was a conflict of interest.

“It is clear that perception and reality have become horribly mangled. I have stepped down from the Nike position I have held for 38 years,” he said.

His decision comes two days after allegations surfaced the Coe lobbied for Eugene to host the 2021 World Athletics Championships. The American city has close links with Nike and was awarded the event without a bidding process, despite strong interest from Swedish city Gothenburg.

Coe, who said his decision was not a reaction to those claims, added: “The current noise level around this role is not good for the IAAF and for Nike. It is a distraction to the 18-hour days that I and my teams are working to steady the ship. I don’t feel my role with Nike is a conflict of interest but is has become a distraction.”

Coe also announced that he will step down as chair of the British Olympic Association after the conclusion of the Rio Games next year and that his sports marketing company CSM would not tender any IAAF work.

The 59-year-old emphasised, though, that the IAAF ethics commission had told him he could retain his roles with Nike and CSM as long as he was not involved in any decision relating to them.

Coe pointed out he retained his Nike role through his time as London 2012 chairman and BOA chief, with Nike’s rivals adidas the organisations’ partners.

Coe added: “The decision I chose to take in the last few weeks was one that I think reflected my absolute intention to focus as long and as hard as I can on steadying the ship that has been rocking rather badly recently.”

Coe has found himself at the centre of one of sport’s biggest scandals since taking over as head of the IAAF, an unpaid position, from Lamine Diack in August.

Revelations by the World Anti-Doping Agency about a state-sponsored doping system in Russia have seemed the country banned from international competition by the IAAF, a sanction the Russian athletics federation (ARAF) has now accepted.

There have been allegations of corruption and cover-ups at the IAAF too, with Diack being investigated over an alleged payment of more than €1m to cover up doping offences by Russian athletes.

However, former long jumper Jade Jones said Coe’s delay in leaving his Nike position had damaged his credibility.

She said on Twitter: “Coe should have ended role with Nike asap, to show good faith & integrity! Now he’s made himself look as if hes “like” his predecessor!”

The allegations Coe lobbied Diack about the host of the 2021 World Championships came in a BBC investigation centred around an internal Nike email from January claiming Coe gave assurances he supported the Eugene bid, but had been told by Diack that no decision on the championships would be made in April.

Diack later announced the award of the event in April, catching many by surprise. Coe, who had already rejected the claims, said his conversation in the email was entirely above board.

“I was in a conversation with a Nike official in discharging my ambassadorial role, discussing a range of issues,” he said.

“I was asked specifically about my view of what was happening (around the hosting of the championships). It wasn’t the only question I’d had in that subject - there was a high level of speculation from both bidding cities as to what the process was going to be. I sought clarification from the president of the IAAF, who told me he saw no reason as to why that bidding process shouldn’t continue.

“The best advice I could give to any cities was to put your best foot forward and get into the bidding process.”

However, culture, media and sport select committee member Damian Collins said Coe still had questions to answer. Collins, who had called on the peer to cut his ties with Nike, said on Twitter doing so was “the right decision”.

But he added: “Even though Seb Coe has given up his Nike job there are still questions to answer about the awarding of the Eugene 2021 world championships.”


Monday, 9 November 2015

Coe in Russia Friday13th Deadine


Lord Coe has given Russia until Friday to respond to WADA's accusations of systematic doping and has vowed to do everything he can to fix athletics.

The World Anti-Doping Agency has recommended Russia be banned from international competition upon accusations of doping, cover-ups and extortion in an intensive report released in Geneva on Monday.

The report identified ''systemic failures'' within the International Association of Athletics Federation (IAAF) and the Russian athletics federation (ARAF) to ''prevent or diminish the possibility of an effective anti-doping programme''.

The IAAF president Coe pledged to fix these failures and restore trust in the sport, but he insisted they must wait for Russia's official response before possibly suspending the nation.

He said: "I've asked the council to convene on Friday, which we will, to review their response and then look at the next steps.

"This is a matter for my council. Sanctions could follow. It is possible we could end up with a suspension on Friday. 

"We need to hear properly what answer the Russian Athletics Federation gives us to the welter of allegations. I want to wait for the official response from the federation. They are our member.

Jo Pavey & Paula Radcliffe amongs the names to give their thoughts on WADA's report

"Clearly we need to absorb the report, but the broader point here is that if any of our anti-doping processes have failed, or our internal governance has failed, and clearly rogue elements are involved, then I will fix it."

Lord Coe's predecessor Lamine Diack is currently being investigated over an alleged payment of more than one million euros to cover up doping offences by Russian athletes.

Coe heaped praise on Diack when he succeeded him in August and said he was ready to face criticism himself now that allegations of corruption have reached the office in which he now presides.

"The allegations made about certain people were deeply shocking and the scale and extent of the report is equally shocking. If those allegations are proven then it's extremely damaging," he said.

"I realise I'm going to come in for some criticism for the remarks I made within moments of winning the right to be in the position I'm in today. That does, of course, presuppose that I made those remarks with a list of allegations sitting in front of me. I didn't.

"Athletes have to know that they have in me and my council colleagues a group of people who are in their corner. My responsibility now is to create a sport, and systems, that are accountable, responsible and responsive, and I will do everything I can to fix it.

"I've been in this sport for nearly 50 years. You'd have to be unhuman not to be shocked by this. But I also have the responsibility now to put in place whatever systems we need to have to make sure we never return to this place again.

"I have to have confidence I can do that. I am in a position now to make change and I welcome the chance to do that."

Interpol, which is based in Lyon, has said the investigation involving sports officials and athletes suspected of doping cover-ups will be led by French prosecutors, who are already investigating Diack.

The International Olympic Commitee's ethics team has called for Diack to be suspended as an honorary member, and said: "This is a deeply shocking report and very saddening for the world of sport."


Tuesday, 8 September 2015

Radcliffe Reacts to Jesse Norman


Paula Radcliffe has "categorically" denied any form of cheating in a statement following questions raised during a parliamentary select committee "effectively implicated" her in the Sunday Times' allegations of blood doping in athletics.

Jesse Norman MP suggested winners and medallists at the London Marathon and "potentially British athletes" were under suspicion.

Radcliffe was not specifically named.

But she is a three-time London Marathon winner and the only British athlete since 1996 to triumph at the event.

Following the Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee hearing, she issued a statement saying she was "devastated" her name had been "linked to these wide-ranging accusations".

The Sunday Times published data from 5,000 athletes, which it had reviewed by scientists and said revealed an "extraordinary extent of cheating".

The International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) called the allegations "sensationalist and confusing" and denied it had failed in its duty to carry out effective blood testing.

Radcliffe said she had the "greatest respect" for people "responsibly trying to uncover cheating", but added she was "profoundly disappointed that the cloak of parliamentary privilege" had been used to tarnish her reputation, without recourse.

She said: "I have campaigned long and hard throughout my career for a clean sport. I have publicly condemned cheats and those who aid them. These accusations threaten to undermine all I have stood and competed for, as well as my hard-earned reputation.

"By linking me to allegations of cheating, damage done to my name and reputation can never be fully repaired, no matter how untrue I know them to be."

Radcliffe, who also won the New York Marathon three times and the Chicago Marathon, retired from competitive athletics this year following a persistent foot injury.

She said she "wrestled long and hard with a desire to speak out" following the initial publication of the joint Sunday Times and ARD/WDR investigation of 12,000 blood tests from 5,000 athletes between 2001 and 2012.

She said she had wanted to "fully explain any fluctuations" in her blood data, but was advised she would risk her name being connected with "false allegations".

"As a result of today's parliamentary hearing I can no longer maintain my silence," she added.


Sunday, 16 August 2015

IAAF Accused of Blocking Reports


World athletics’ governing body has been accused of blocking a survey that revealed a third of top athletes admitting cheating.

The International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) allegedly stopped the study, which was carried out in 2011, being published and prevented its authors from speaking about it, according to the Sunday Times.

The University of Tubingen in Germany, which led the research, is quoted as saying: “The IAAF’s delaying publication for so long without good reason is a serious encroachment on the freedom of publication.”

Researchers compiled the information from athletes who competed at the world championships in Daegu, South Korea, four years ago. The results reportedly show that 29-34% of the 1,800 competitors had confessed to using banned performance-enhancing techniques in the previous 12 months.

“These findings demonstrate that doping is remarkably widespread among elite athletes, and remains largely unchecked despite current biological testing programmes,” they concluded.

When asked about the study – which was financed by the World Anti-Doping Agency (Wada) – being held back, the lead author, Rolf Ulrich, said: “The IAAF is blocking it. I think they are stakeholders with Wada and they just blocked the whole thing.”

The IAAF is quoted as saying: “Discussions are ongoing with the research team and Wada regarding publication.”

It comes against a backdrop of doping allegations in world athletics.


Saturday, 8 August 2015

WADA Begin Investigation


The World Anti-Doping Agency will launch an urgent investigation into widespread doping allegations in international athletics.

The German broadcaster ARD/WDR and the Sunday Times gained access to a database containing more than 12,000 blood tests from 5,000 athletes. It claimed more than 800 athletes – and a third of all medallists in endurance events at recent Olympics and World Championships – had suspicious blood test results that were not followed up by the International Association of Athletics Federations.

In a lengthy and detailed response by the IAAF to the claims, the athletics governing body said the allegations were “sensationalist and confusing”.

However, the Wada president, Sir Craig Reedie, confirmed the matter had now been referred to its independent commission.

He said: “Wada is committed to protecting the confidentiality of athletes; and, therefore, has asked its independent commission to commence its investigation with urgency.

“We are confident that the IAAF, which has formally agreed to full cooperation with the commission with respect to its inquiries, is equally committed.”

Lord Coe, who is running for the presidency of the IAAF later this month, launched a furious defence of international athletics’ record in dealing with doping, claiming the reports were a “declaration of war”.

The former double Olympic 1,500m gold medallist, however, accepted some countries are causing a problem to the sport. Russia has had a number of high-profile drugs cheats banned.

The Sunday Times, though, continues to back its story and labelled the IAAF response “disingenuous”, questioning whether the organisation was committed to tackling doping. The two experts, Michael Ashenden and Robin Parisotto, said they stood by their beliefs.
Advertisement

While criticising the way the information was put into the public domain, Wada hopes its investigation – scheduled to deliver its report by the end of the year – will discover the truth.

Reedie’s statement continued: “Wada deplores the manner in which this data was obtained, leaked to the media and analysed. To suggest or imply doping with respect to any athlete whose data is contained within the database is, at the very least, irresponsible and potentially libellous.

“I ask that any athlete, or anti-doping organisation, concerned that their rights are being eroded or inappropriately challenged refer those concerns to the commission, which intends to commence its work immediately.”

Wada’s director general, David Howman, believes the analysis of the results in the leaked report need to be carefully placed into context.

Howman said: “A portion of the data within the database pre-dates the Athlete Biological Passport [ABP], which was introduced in 2009. This data could not possibly be considered doping, legally or otherwise.

“In addition, atypical blood data, which may be within this database from 2009-2012, is not necessarily indicative of doping.

“The strength of the ABP is that it monitors selected biological variables over time, via the blood, which indirectly reveal the effects of doping.

“Wada’s rules governing the ABP are designed to ensure a complete and fair review of ABP profiles and require the unanimous opinion of three experts.”


Monday, 10 January 2011

Questions over Trap operation


A manager based in England or Ireland could not have expected to undergo an operation of such magnitude while staying under the public radar
Paul Rowan, Published: 9 January 2011

AN IRATE reader of one national newspaper accused it of ageism during the week over its coverage of Giovanni Trapattoni’s operation on the carotid artery in his neck, but realism might be the more accurate description.

Questions concerning the health of the Irish management team are not a matter of prurient curiosity, but of genuine public interest, as long as the matter is handled respectfully.
You don’t need to go back too far to find a distressing example of seeing a member of the Irish management team struggling not only with the demands of the job, but with his fading health.

On a cold November night back in 2006, the sight of Sir Bobby Robson out in the open under the old West Stand at Lansdowne Road, one of his arms in a sling because of paralysis, filled all those who saw him with concern. Especially given that he had recently returned from another operation to remove cancerous growths, the disease that would eventually take his life three years later at 76.

Robson loved working — and nobody would deny his right to do so — but his time as Ireland’s assistant manager can’t be regarded as a successful one and not just because the results were poor. The feeling persists that it was a job too far for a man whose passion for the game knew no bounds and is matched only by a few, among them Giovanni Trapattoni.

The Italian, aged 71, is clearly in a far more robust physical condition than Robson was when he came over to do a job for Ireland, as anybody who has seen the Italian’s workouts on the training pitch will testify.

But that doesn’t preclude the media from asking questions of his health, even if it is a cue for the politically correct brigade to start penning their letters to the editor. Furthermore Trapattoni — and possibly the FAI, depending where the truth lies here — miscalculated by initially trying to keep the operation under wraps.

Apart from a brief statement from Trapattoni and a radio interview given by the Ireland team doctor, Alan Byrne, the FAI has refused to comment on matters concerning the manager’s health.

The reticence is understandable given the way this episode has been handled. Reports that Trapattoni had suffered a stroke first emerged in the Milan press and were then repeated in Ireland.

The damage was already done by the time the denials of a stroke were made by the FAI and Trapattoni, and the question remains why we weren’t told about the operation in the first place when it clearly was something more than routine. The FAI said, on RTE News at One, that they were not aware of any recent medical issue and a spokesperson said that he did not have a stroke.

So either Trapattoni didn’t tell the FAI or, as some sources in the association have indicated, he told certain individuals and it was decided the whole matter should go no further.

Bad decision either way, but an understandable one. Back in August, before the friendly against Argentina, Trapattoni was admitted to the Mater hospital with stomach pains, which we were told was caused by scar tissue from a previous, unspecified, operation. Did that operation also take place during Trapattoni’s tenure?